Articles | Bespoke web | Design | Editor | WORKS
INU AI| Photoessays | Pumpkin
Cartierism | Addiction | Arctic | Canada | Diabetes | DIET| Essiac | Health | Health benefit list | Healthy food | Illness | Language | Niacin | Reference | Selenium | Pollution | Marik 201 | Marik 2017
Ahsoak | Cooking | Dr lustig | Fats | Food guide | Food prices | Health drive | History | Hunting | Nutrition facts | SUGAR
Part 1 |PART 2| Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
Sugar:The Bitter Truth
Sugar:The Bitter Truth

20:44 None the less, here's Center for the Science
20:46 and Public Interest and the Corn Refiners Association.
20:49 Everybody remember last year, when Gavin Newsom
20:51 floated his soda tax, last February?
20:55 Governor Patterson of New York has since floated one.
20:58 And other people are starting to talk about it.
21:00 So, why are they saying this?
21:01 Well, they're saying obesity's a problem,
21:03 kids are drinking soda, let's tax it.
21:06 So they're talking about soda like it's empty calories.
21:10 I'm here to tell you that it goes way beyond empty calories.
21:14 The reason why this is a problem is because
21:17 fructose is a poison, it's not about the calories.
21:22 It has nothing to do with the calories.
21:25 It's a poison by itself, and I'm gonna show you that.
21:28 Nonetheless, I just wanna read you
21:30 this paragraph here in yellow.
21:33 "We respectfully urge that the proposal
21:34 "be revised as soon as possible to reflect
21:37 "the scientific evidence that demonstrates
21:38 "no material differences in the health effects
21:40 "of high fructose corn syrup and sugar."
21:43 I agree.
21:44 Here's the important sentence.
21:46 "The real issue is that excessive consumption
21:48 "of any sugars may lead to health problems."
21:51 I agree, that's exactly right.
21:54 Not may, does, does.
21:58 So, here's the secular trend in
22:00 fructose consumption over the past 100 years.
22:03 Before we had food processing, we used to
22:06 get our fructose from fruits and vegetables,
22:08 and if we did that today, we would consume
22:11 about 15 grams per day of fructose.
22:15 Not sugar, fructose.
22:16 So sugar would be 30 grams, it'd be double.
22:19 We're just talking about fructose, today.
22:22 Prior to World War II, before it got rationed again,
22:26 we were up to about 16 to 24, about 20 grams.
22:29 So, a small increase from the beginning
22:32 of the century to World War II.
22:35 Then, in 1977, just as high fructose corn syrup
22:38 was hitting the market, we had increased that,
22:41 we had, basically, doubled up to 37 grams per day,
22:44 or 8% of total caloric intake.
22:47 By 1994 we were up to 55 grams of the stuff per day.
22:51 Remember, if you wanna do sugar, then double the number.
22:54 So, that's 10.2, so you can see that more and more
22:58 of our caloric intake, a higher percentage
23:00 is being accounted for by sugar every single year.
23:04 So, it's not just that we're eating more.
23:07 We're eating more sugar.
23:10 And for adolescents today, up to almost 75 grams,
23:14 12% of total caloric intake.
23:16 25% of the adolescents today consume
23:21 at least 15% of their calories from fructose alone.
23:25 This is a disaster, an absolute unmitigated disaster.
23:29 The fat's going down, the sugar's going up,
23:33 and we're all getting sick.
23:35 Now let me show you why.
23:39 How'd this happen?
23:41 Why'd it happen?
23:42 So, this is where the politics comes in.
23:45 This is the perfect storm,
23:47 and it was created from three political winds
23:49 that swirled around all at the same time
23:51 to create this perfect storm.
23:54 So, the first political wind,
23:57 everything bad that ever happened
23:59 in this country started with one man.
24:01 (audience laughs)
24:05 And it's still being felt today.
24:08 So, Richard Nixon, in his paranoia back in 1972,
24:13 food prices were going up and down, and up and down.
24:16 I'm gonna show you that on the next slide.
24:17 And he was worried that this was
24:19 actually gonna cost him the election.
24:20 So, he admonished his Secretary of Agriculture,
24:24Earl Rusty Butz, I love that name,
24:28to basically take food off the political table,
24:33to make food a non-issue in presidential elections.
24:37Well, the only way to do that was to make food cheap.
24:41So, he was out to find all methods
24:44to be able to decrease the price of food.
24:46Remember Nixon's war on poverty?
24:49We're suffering from it today.
24:51That's what this is.
24:54Second political wind, the advent
24:56of high fructose corn syrup.
24:57So, this was invented in 1966 at Saga Medical School
25:01in Japan, by a guy named Takasaki, who's still alive.
25:04As far as I'm concerned, this stuff
25:06is Japan's revenge for World War II,
25:09except, of course, that they're suffering
25:10from it now, themselves.
25:13Like everything, it always comes back to haunt you.
25:16And it was introduced to the American Market in 1975.
25:19So, what do you think happened
25:20to the price of sugar when this thing hit the market?
25:24Here's what happened.
25:26So, here's the US producer price index of sugar
25:29going up and down, and up and down.
25:31This is not good.
25:34Stability is at 100%, if it stays nice and stable
25:37at 100%, that's what you want if you're a politician.
25:41Up and down, here's where corn sweeteners
25:44entered the market, 1975, 1980.
25:47And you can see that since then the price
25:48of sugar has remained remarkably constant.
25:51And it did so, not just in the US,
25:53but also on the international stage.
25:55Here's the London price doing the same thing.
25:57And when you look at the difference in price
25:59between sugar and high fructose corn syrup,
26:03you can see that high fructose corn syrup's
26:05about half the price.
26:07So, in other words, it's cheap.
26:09So, high fructose corn syrup is evil.
26:11But it's not evil because it's metabolically evil.
26:14It's evil because it's economically evil.
26:17Because it's so cheap that it's
26:19found it's way into everything.
26:22It's found it's way into hamburger buns,
26:25pretzels, barbecue sauce, and ketchup, almost everything.
26:30Somebody emailed me the other day
26:32and told me they went into their local grocery store
26:34and went through every single loaf of bread
26:37on the shelf, and out of 32 types of bread
26:42on the shelf, only one of them did not
26:44have high fructose corn syrup in it.
26:47So, we are being poisoned by this stuff,
26:50and it's been added surreptitiously
26:52to all of our food, every processed food.
26:55The question is why?
26:57Well, you'll see why in a minute.
27:00So, the corn refiners like to point out,
27:02"Well, you know, it's just been a substitution.
27:06"As the high fructose corn syrup's gone up,
27:07:the sugar's gone down.
27:09"You know, we're just replacing, like gram for gram."
27:13Well, not exactly, because here's
27:1573 pounds of sugar per year.
27:18This is from the Economic Research Service
27:20of the US Department of Agriculture.
27:22So disappearance data.
27:2373 pounds, up to 95 pounds by 2000.
27:29And there's something missing from this slide.
27:32Anybody wanna tell me what it is?
27:33What's missing?
27:36Juice, juice is missing.
27:38'Cause juice is sucrose, right, sugar.
27:41And juice causes obesity.
27:44So this is a study done by Myles Faith,
27:46a prospective study in inner city Harlem toddlers.
27:49And the number of juice servings per day
27:53predicts the change in BMI score per month
27:56in these inner city Harlem toddlers.
27:58Now, where do these inner city
28:00Harlem toddlers get their juice?
28:03From what, from where, from whom?
28:08From WIC.
28:11Anybody heard of WIC?
28:12You know what WIC is?
28:13Women Infants Children, right?
28:15A government entitlement program set up under who?
28:20Nixon, to prevent failure to thrive.
28:23They did.
28:27This is the equal and opposite reaction.
28:31So, let's add juice in, here it is.
28:33So, most fructose items when you put it together,
28:35now we're up to 113 pounds on this graph,
28:38and I just heard from Brian Williams,
28:39of NBC News, after the most recent study came out,
28:44that was in the Journal of Clinical Investigation,
28:46that we are actually up to 141 pounds of sugar per year.
28:50Each of us.
28:51That's what we're up to.
28:51141 pounds of sugar per year.
28:54Now, do you think that this might
28:58have some detrimental effects on you?
29:04Hasn't stopped you, has it?
29:06That's the point, it hasn't stopped you.
29:08That's why we need to talk about this.
29:11So, juice consumption increases
29:13the risk for Type 2 diabetes.
29:15So this is the relative risk ratio
29:17as juice intake goes up, and this is in the Nurse's Study.
29:20Showing again, juice consumption,
29:23sucrose, obesity, diabetes.
29:26Okay, the third political storm, that's swirling around
29:30to create this disaster, this mega-typhoon,
29:35that thing that happened in 1982,
29:38the USDA, the American Hearth Association,
29:40the American Medical Association,
29:41all telling us we had to reduce our consumption of fat.
29:46Now, why did they tell us that?
29:49To stop what?
29:51To stop hear disease.
29:52Did we?
29:54No, we didn't, did we?
29:56In fact, it's worked the exact opposite.
29:58We've only created more.
30:01So, now how did this come to be?
30:03Why did they tell us to stop eating fat?
30:06Well, in the early 1970s we discovered
30:09something in our blood called LDL,
30:12low-density lipoproteins.
30:13You've heard of that, right?
30:15Is it good or bad?
30:16- [Audience Member] Bad.
30:17- Not so bad, we'll talk about it.
30:19In the mid 1970s we learned that
30:21dietary fat raised your LDL.
30:24So, if dietary fat is A, and LDL is B,
30:27we learned that A lead to B.
30:29Dietary fat definitely increases your LDL,
30:32no argument, it's true.
30:34And then, finally, in the late 1970s we learned
30:37that LDL correlated with cardiovascular disease.
30:41So let's call cardiovascular disease C.
30:44So we learned that B lead to C.
30:47So, the thought process by some
30:50very smart nutritionists, et cetera,
30:53the USDA et cetera, said,
30:55"Well if A leads to B, and B leads to C
30:57"then A must lead to C, therefore, no A, no C."
31:01This was the logic.
31:02Now, any logicians in the room?
31:05Anybody see any problems with that logic?
31:10Go ahead.
31:11(speaking away from microphone)
31:13- That's right, the premise is incorrect.
31:15And I'll tell you why the premise is incorrect.
31:17Because this suggests that this is all transitive.
31:21But, in fact, only the contrapositive is transitive.
31:24So, it's not no A, no C, it's no C, no A.
31:28So, the logic isn't even right.
31:30There's faulty logic here.
31:32So, this doesn't work on any level.
31:35So, I'm gonna show you why this doesn't work.
31:39But, before I how you why it doesn't work,
31:40I'm gonna show you that this was
31:42a battle royal back in the 1970s.
31:45This was not a simple thing.
31:47There were people lined up on both sides of this story.
31:51So, this, over here, is a book, 1972 it came out,
31:56and it was called Pure White and Deadly.
31:59It's all about sugar.
32:00Written by a British physiologist,
32:02nutritionist, endocrinologist,
32:03by the name of John Yudkin.
32:05Now, I never knew John Yudkin he's passed away.
32:08But, I read this book about a year ago.
32:12And without even knowing it, I was a Yudkin acolyte.
32:16I was a Yudkin disciple.
32:17Every single thing that this man said
32:20in 1972 is the God's honest truth.
32:25And if you wanna read a true prophecy, you find this book.
32:29It's not easy to find, but you go find this book.
32:31And I'm telling you, every single thing
32:34this guy said has come to pass.
32:36It's astounding, I am in awe of this guy.
32:40But on the other side we had this guy over here.
32:43His name was Ancel Keys.
32:45Anybody heard of him?
32:47So, Ancel Keys was a Minnesota epidemiologist,
32:51very interested in the cause of cardiovascular disease.
32:53And he performed the first multivariate
32:57regression analysis without computers.
33:00Now, anybody know what that means?
33:02Multivariate regression analysis?
33:04So, this is where you take a whole lot of data,
33:06and normally you would just run a few computer programs,
33:09but basically, the object is to try
33:11to figure out what causes what,
33:13and to try to factor out other things
33:15and determine what the contribution
33:17of various things all at once are
33:19to an outcome that you're looking for.
33:21So, he was interested in cardiovascular disease.
33:24So, what he did was he did this study,
33:27along with other people around the world,
33:28called the Seven Countries Study.
33:31Very famous, front page of Time Magazine in 1980.
33:36So, here's the data on the Seven Country Study.
33:39So, we have the US, Canada, Australia,
33:42England and Wales, Italy, Japan.
33:44And here's percent calories from fat on the x axis,
33:48and here we have coronary disease death rate on the y axis.
33:51And so you'd say, "Oh, look at that."
33:53I mean, it's very obvious, isn't it.
33:55Sure, percent calories from fat
33:57correlates very nicely with coronary disease, right?
34:00Except for one little problem.
34:02Anybody see it?
34:06Japan and Italy?
34:08So, how much sugar do they eat?
34:10Didn't I tell you the Japanese diet eliminates fructose?
34:13They never even had it 'til
34:14we brought it to them after World War II.
34:17Italy, aside from gelato, I mean what else they got?
34:23They got a lot of pasta,
34:24there's a lot of glucose, but no fructose.
34:26There's no sugar in the Italian diet
34:29other than the occasional sweet, which they moderate.
34:32They're very careful about moderating, and they cost a lot.
34:35But, here we got England, Wales, Canada, Australia, US,
34:38you know, we are sugarholics, aren't we?
34:40We're also fataholics.
34:42So, in fact, the fat migrated with the sugar.
34:44So, here's, this is from Keys's own work.
34:48Page 262, if you wanna pick up the 500 page volume.
34:52And I'm just gonna read you the
34:53one paragraph that talks about this.
34:56The fact that the incidence rate
34:58of coronary heart disease was significantly correlated
35:00with the average percentage of calories
35:02from sucrose in the diet, is explained by
35:04the intercorrelation of sucrose with saturated fat.
35:09In other words, donuts.
35:13Where ever there was the fat, there was sucrose too.
35:16Because these guys here eat donuts.
35:21(audience laughs)
35:22Partial correlation analysis show
35:24that with saturated fat constant,
35:25there was no significant correlation
35:27between dietary sucrose and the incidence
35:28of coronary heart disease.
35:31Okay, when you do a multivariate linear regression analysis,
35:34you have to do it both ways.
35:37You have to do holding fat constant
35:41showing the sucrose doesn't work,
35:42and then you have to hold sucrose constant
35:44and who that fat still works.
35:46You see that anywhere?
35:48He didn't do it, he didn't do it.
35:52He didn't do the thing that you need to do
35:55to do a multivariate linear regression analysis.
35:57Now, this was done before computers.
36:00We can't check the work.
36:02He's dead, he died in 2004.
36:05So, we're left with a conundrum.
36:08Do we believe this?
36:10Do we believe this study, because we based
36:1330 years of nutrition education, and information,
36:17and policy in this country on this study.
36:22And, as far as I'm concerned, it has a hole
36:24as big as the one in the USS Cole,
36:29all right, you got it?
36:31Everybody, am I debunking, yes, no?
36:35Let's keep going.
36:37Remember, I told you LDL may be not so bad?
36:40Well, here's why.
36:41Because there really isn't one LDL, there are two.
36:46There are two LDLs.
36:47Here's one over here, it's called
36:49pattern A or large buoyant LDL.
36:53So, everybody knows that LDL correlates
36:55with cardiovascular disease, and that's true.
36:57I'm not gonna argue that, that is true.
36:59But, it's not this one, pattern A LDL.
37:03These guys are so light, they are buoyant, they float.
37:08So, they get carried through the bloodstream,
37:09and they don't even have a chance,
37:11because they're so big and they're so buoyant,
37:13they don't even get underneath the edge
37:15of the endothelial cells in the vasculature
37:18to start the plaque formation process.
37:21But, over here we have this other guy, over here,
37:22called pattern B or small dense LDL.
37:25You see the difference?
37:26These guys are dense.
37:28These guys don't float.
37:30These guys are small, they get underneath
37:32the edge of the surface of the surface
37:34of the endothelial cells,
37:35and they start the plaque formation.
37:36And it's been shown by numerous investigators now,
37:39the dense LDL is the bad guy.
37:42Okay, now, when we measure LDL in the bloodstream,
37:44when you do a lipid profile,
37:46you measure both of them together,
37:48because it's too hard to distinguish the two.
37:51So, when you get an LDL, you're getting both LDLs.
37:55The neutral one and the bad one.
37:58Now, how can you tell whether your LDL
38:01is the neutral one or the bad one.
38:04What you do is you look at your triglycerides level
38:07in association with it, 'cause your triglycerides
38:09tell you which one it is.
38:11So here, here's pattern A over here,
38:13big large buoyant LDLs, and you'll notice 38:17 that the triglycerides are low, and your HDL is high.
38:22 That's what you want, you want a low triglyceride,
38:23 high HDL, 'cause that's the good cholesterol.
38:26 You want high good cholesterol.
38:28 Over here, you have pattern B.
38:29 And here you have high triglyceride, low HDL.
38:32 That's the bad guy, that's the guy you don't wanna be.
38:34 'Cause you're gonna die of a heart attack.
38:37 No question about it.
38:38 Triglyceride to HDL ratio actually predicts
38:40 cardiovascular disease way better than LDL ever did.
38:45 Point is, when you measure LDL, you measure both.
38:49 So, dietary fat raises your large buoyant.
38:54 What do you think raises your small dense?
38:59 Carbohydrate.
39:00 Okay, so here's percent carbohydrate,
39:02 and here's your pattern B going up.
39:04 Everybody got it?
39:05 So what did we do?
39:07 What did we do in 1982?
39:09 (speaking away from microphone)
39:12 What did we do?
39:13 We went on a high carb diet, which was
39:16 supposed to be a low fat diet, right?
39:19 So, here's the low fat craze.
39:22 Took America and the world by storm.
39:25 Because the content of low fat
39:27 home cooked food, that you cook by yourself,
39:29 in your house, you can control the content of fat.
39:33 But when you process it, low fat processed food,
39:38 it tastes like cardboard.
39:40 It tastes like (bleep).
39:44 So the food companies knew that, so what'd they do?
39:47 They had to make it palatable?
39:49 So, how do you make something
39:49 palatable that has no fat in it?
39:51 You add the, sugar.
39:54 So, everybody remember Snackwells?
39:57 Two grams of fat down, 13 grams of carbohydrate up,
40:01 four of them being sugar, so that it was palatable.
40:05 Well, we've just shown you that
40:06 that's the worst thing you could do.
40:09 And that's what we've done.
40:10 And we're still doing it, today.

xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
xs sm lg
Remember me, buy my shirts!
pop art