Richard Sexton
18 September 2018 ·
Lipinski Et. Al. 2017. Somebody should correct Wikipedia.
"It seems that the most reasonable approach would be to cooperate with medical centers such as those in Sweden, which have already successfully used sodium selenite in the treatment of cancer."
Let's hear that again: " successfully used sodium selenite in the treatment of cancer." This is in contradiction to what it says in Wiki.
"To do this, there is a need for thorough changes in the legislature aimed at protecting the life and health of patients with cancer. Last but not least, is the possible therapeutic effect of anticoagulation coupled with the removal of iron from the blood of cancer patients [44].
Application of Sodium Selenite in the Prevention and Treatment of Cancers
Marek Kieliszek * ID , Boguslaw Lipinski * and Stanisław Błazejak
Author Contributions: B.L. and M.K. collected and reviewed the literature and writing of manuscript; drafted and critically. S.B. and reviewed the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/…/PMC57…/pdf/cells-06-00039.pdf
cf Amelia Andersdotter, Markus Fors, Manon Ress -NIH
Markus Fors Interesting. I remember you have mentioned Selenium a lot.

Richard Sexton
18 September 2018 ·
"1. Introduction Over 50 years ago, the US President Richard Nixon initiated a “war” against cancer. Although billions of dollars have been spent since that time, and great efforts have been taken in this war, cancer is still present, and except a few forms of cancer (e.g., leukemia in children) morbidity and mortality rates remain at the same level. It should be emphasized that a number of pharmacological compounds have been discovered in recent decades, which unfortunately do not cure cancer in humans, but only prolong their lives, and are very expensive and concurrently beneficial to large pharmaceutical companies [1]. Therefore, the convenient belief that cancer is incurable is prevailing. Despite this pessimistic conclusion, scientists continuously focus on different strategies for treating cancer. While chemical drugs destroy both cancer and healthy cells, it turned out that humans have a very efficient immune system that detects and effectively removes cancer cells [2]. The damage of immune system is one of the potential cause of cancer occurrence. Why a majority of solid tumors are resistant to the treatment of cellular immune system, the so-called immune therapy, remains a mystery. A number of hypotheses have tried to explain this phenomenon, but none of them have drawn a conclusion on how to avoid and overcome this [3]. This article presents the views on these issues based on decades of research on blood proteins and on our personal experience with selenium and its multidirectional anticancer activity.
Sodium selenite is incorrectly considered to be an antioxidant, by contrast to other forms of selenium. In this article, it is argued that this compound plays an important role at the initial phase" Application of Sodium Selenite in the Prevention and Treatment of Cancers Marek Kieliszek * ID , Boguslaw Lipinski * and Stanisław Błazejak ˙ Faculty of Food Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Food Evaluation, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland; stanislaw_blazejak@sggw.pl * Correspondence: marek_kieliszek@sggw.pl or marek-kieliszek@wp.pl (M.K.); b.lipinski2006@rcn.com (B.L.); Tel.: +48-22-593-7664 (M.K.); Fax: +48-22-593-7681 (M.K.) Received: 14 September 2017; Accepted: 21 October 2017; Published: 24 October 2017 -nih

Nii Quaynor shared a link. 8 November at 18:22 ·
SCIENCE.ORG.AU Releasing the immune system’s brakes to fight cancer The science behind the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine https://www.science.org.au/curious/people-medicine/releasing-immune-systems-brakes-fight-cancer

Richard Sexton This is a pile of crap.
"A cancerous tumour can be a confusing thing for the immune system"
No it's not, every cell marked for deletion has a Cyp1B1 enzyme in it. It's created when the cell is formed and (nominally) deleted when DNA passes error checking. A substance that's supposed to be in our food reacts with this enzyme, turns into a substance called picotanneol and kills only that cell. End of story. You can look this up in the usual cancer journals: keywords: potter, burke, cyp1b1

The thing they found is an interesting side effect but not actually useful.

"Unfortunately, checkpoint inhibitors aren’t without their side effects (a no-holds-barred immune response can target healthy cells too, resulting in inflammation) and they won’t necessarily be effective for everyone. More research is still required to improve the effectiveness of the treatments and reduce their side effects. "

So, there's two options, work work with the body or work against it. The latter is a poor choice and not in any way worthy of a Nobel. This should be a keynote speech at an industry dinner for patented US pharmaceuticals and nobody will be taking it anytime soon.
Frank JT Bischop
Admin · 16 October
CANCER
Dr Andrew Saul PH.D. Yes, cancer is awfully common. But cancer is not inevitable and it is not due to bad luck. And generally speaking, it is not a simple matter of "bad genes." Cancer is often due to long-term lousy diet, and it so often persists due to horse-blinder oncology. How many oncologists use niacin and vitamin C to repair DNA? Chase down the science and the recommendations in this 15 minute video. No tricks. Well, maybe one.
🔴 VIDEO LINK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGo9Lw6P5ys
▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️▫️▪️ Orthomolecular Medicine - Practitioners World Wide Orthomolecular Practitioners http://orthomolecular.org/resources/pract.shtml

Richard Sexton Meanwhile, since then....

In 2007 an enzyme was discovered in all cancer cells. It's in the Cytochrome P450-II series and it called "Cyp1B1".

It goes like this: when the nucleus of a cell divides there are not two sets of chromosomes. When that new cell is born it now has this enzyme. After DNA error checking is performed the enzyme is destroyed.

But, if the error checking does not finish for any reason the enzyme is not destroyed and the cell is marked for deletion as defective.

This happens in all animals all the time. Everybody has cancer cells in them at this moment. In nearly evry case the immune system takes care of this. So how does cancer form? Easy, to do this is needs a chemical that is in produce. But, the catch is plants make this in response to mold spores. Since we began using antifungals in 1900 these have reduced the amount of this stuff in non-organic produce by up to 90%.

Thus we now have correlation and causation for the industrial use of antifungals disrupting the food supply and driving up the rate of cancer.

Potter and Burke figured this out in England. Here's the relevant info:

The Cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1B1 [1] only occurs in cancer cells [2][3]. When certain phytoalexins such as resveratrol and salvestrol are ingested these phytoalexins are converted by the P450 enzyme into piceatannol [4], which is fatal to cancer cells but not human cells [5][6].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYP1B1
[2] http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/57/14/3026.short
[3] http://secure.salvestrol.ca/.../isomtalk_schaefer2010.pdf
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piceatannol
[5] http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v86/n5/abs/6600197a.html
[6] http://www.orthomolecular.org/.../pdf/2007-v22n01-p039.pdf

Summarized here by one of the team that discovered it: (Short, 11 mins)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzuHbmhTYWQ
Long (90 mins)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4tpPlqMJ7Y
https://web.archive.org/.../Prostate-cancer-drug-so...
https://web.archive.org/.../article-1832255.../article.html
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG CYP1B1 - Wikipedia
Renee Osgood Molchan I’m not sure I follow...can anyone reword this for a layperson?
Richard Sexton Ok, there's an enxyme in cancer cells not found in human cells.
A certain substance called a salvestrol reacts with that enxyme, turns into stuff called Picotanneol and it kills only that cell.
There are fat soluble and water soluble salvestrols, they're fond in some plants. The problem is the plant makes them in response to mold and when we spray antifungals, no mold and the plant doesn't make them as much. They're 90% reduced in sprayed produce.
Here's two videos one short one long from one of the guys that found it.
(Short, 11 mins) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzuHbmhTYWQ
Long (90 mins)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4tpPlqMJ7Y
YOUTUBE.COM Professor Dan Burke on Salvestrols - an interview by…
Renee Osgood Molchan Richard Sexton thank you so much for explaining. I have heard before about a link between cancer and mold and want to learn more so those links are very helpful.
Lisette Callis Richard Sexton interesting.